The causes of a societal problem in the Bay Area of California Essay

The causes of a societal problem in the Bay Area of California - Essay Example This area has reputable traits for its beautiful scenery, independent political styles, and entrepreneurship. However, as much as this area performs among the best economically the cost of living in this region is relatively high. For instance, social issues bombard this vast region like any other growing society. In this regard, this paper will dwell on the causes of the societal issue that the bay region experiences that opposes its success. Housing and settlement problems (Social issue) Over the years, the number of homeless families in the Bay area has been on the increase (Miles & Tim 150). The high cost of housing has seen many families wait in line for them to acquire temporary shelters and homes. Some of the families spend cold night in streets and parks, as they have nowhere permanent that they can call home. The security risks that these families subject themselves are high as they living in the streets are not safe for anyone except the gangs. Figuratively speaking, the nu mber of families in the shelter waiting list is about two hundred and sixty four families. A notable number of these families have no past record of being homeless but the recent global recession made a turn on their lives. The effects of the global recession to the housing sector in the Bay area (Financial issues) During this period, the cost of housing and mortgages went up as the government of the United State tried to curb the real estate bubble (Jones and Perry 110). According to Kiplinger magazine publication (78), the values of property in this period went high especially to those who had mortgage payments. Subsequently, the mortgage rates were high and many people in the Bay region could not keep up with their mortgage payments. Essentially, this led to foreclosure by banking institutions to curb the deficiency. During this period, many lost their jobs leaving them without any source of livelihood. In short, when the crisis began these families did not have anything to cushi on them. On the other hand, the low-income earners who cannot afford to be homeowners have felt the pinch as part of their income pays rent. In essence, there is no affordable housing in this region. Over the past years, concentration has been on infrastructural development hence sidelining housing projects and developments. This becomes a societal crisis as the low earning families risk entering the homeless families’ shelters. On the contrary, those adversely affected by the homelessness crisis is single adults rather than those in families. This is because the political ensure that they shelter the homeless families to evade political heat. They also use this situation as a campaign tool to woe votes from the public and trample over their opponents (Dyble 267). Poverty levels and starvation due to racial factors (Financial issues) Another societal issue that the Bay region is in a constant battle with is the need to provide food assistance and poverty (Goldsmith & Blakely 15). A bigger part of the Californian population lives under the federally set poverty line per annum. Children are the worst hit with the Oakland region within the same region leading with the largest number of children living relatively below the poverty line. Ironically, the racial difference is the factor that propels the poverty levels. For instance, the poverty levels were high within the African Americans as compared to their American

The United States vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The United States vs Jones - Research Paper Example However, arguments emerged because the court used evidence from wiretaps, search incidences on traffic stop as well as placement of GPS on Jones vehicle for 4weeks until his interdiction (Totenberg). With respect to the law, these were a violation of the right of an individual. The argument by Jones seems realistic since indeed the FBI violated his right in respect to the legal law on the fourth amendment (Totenberg). The police ought to acquire a warrant prior to the placement of any tracking devices on a suspect to ensure that the laws are not violated. The police have the obligation to keep law and order and should therefore serve as examples to the public. In attaching any tracking devices to a suspect’s vehicle, it becomes a violation of law and action should be taken against the police officers who do not pursue protocol. According to the fourth amendment, liberties that are liberty to privacy and liberty to privacy from arbitrary invasion are protected. It states that a search should be carried out when one violates a sensible anticipation of privacy while a seizure is the hindrance with an individual possessory concern in possessions. A person usually is seized if the police or any enforcement personnel use force to restrain a person that is if it seems reasonable in a similar situation. The law enforcement workforce are however restricted from any irrational searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment outlaws indiscriminate searches, except unusual situations place the community in danger. The claimant ought to contain a justifiable expectation of confidentiality at the searched locality. This expectation must meet up mutually the subjective and objective assessment of rationality. The subjective assessment needs the claimant to anticipate privacy legitimately, and the objective assessment entail that, given the circumstance, a rational person in a comparable situation also would have anticipated privacy. Order to keep away from illegitimately s earching or seizing possessions, law enforcement officeholder normally acquire warrant. They must demonstrate probable reason, supported by pledge or affirmation, and express in specify the place they will investigate and the things they will confiscate. A judge may possibly find apparent reason only by probing the entirety of the situation. According to an oral argument by Michael R. Dreeben on behalf of the petitioner, in the utilization of GPS and wiretaps in thecae of Jones, it is a violation of the fourth amendment while in the case of Knotts, the fourth amendment was not infringed because the police used visual and beeper to survey him. Michael argues with Dreeben on various cases in which the police did not infringe the laws in support of the petitioner. The oral argument provides the various instances in which the police have managed to interdict suspects without the violation of the fourth amendment. The oral argument presents various issues concerning the fourth amendment and its implementation within law enforcement organizations. In the oral argument, Dreeben suggests that the court should institute a suspicion standard, which enables the police to follow suspects on public roadways, and allow them to conduct visually, as well as allow them to investigate leads and tips if the circumstances have no possible cause (Alderson 26). Dreeben also suggested that the police should probably use the GPS during the early periods of any investigation that is before